Industrial automation continues to evolve rapidly, incorporating digital networks, smart instrumentation, and industrial Ethernet protocols. Despite these advancements, analog current loops—specifically 4–20 mA—remain the most widely deployed communication method for transmitting process variables such as pressure, temperature, level, and flow from field instruments to control systems like PLCs, DCS, and SCADA.
Textbooks and engineering training traditionally highlight two main reasons for its widespread use:
- Strong noise immunity in electrically harsh environments
- Stable signal transmission over long cable distances
While these points are correct, they only address the operational advantages. The deeper, less frequently discussed reason is that the 20 mA upper limit was intentionally chosen to remain below the dangerous electrical current threshold that can cause fatal physiological effects in humans, as defined by the IEC 60479-1 standard. In other words, 4–20 mA is not only an instrumentation decision—it is a safety decision grounded in human biology.
The endurance of the 4–20 mA standard therefore is not due to legacy inertia, but because it satisfies a rare intersection of electrical safety, engineering reliability, diagnostics, and deterministic behavior in critical industrial systems.
The Origin of 20 mA — A Human Safety Boundary
The IEC 60479-1 international standard defines how electrical current passing through the human body affects physiological functions. The standard plots current magnitude against exposure duration, dividing human response into four zones:

| IEC 60479-1 Zone | Physiological Effect |
| AC-1 | No perceptible effect |
| AC-2 | Painful shock, reversible muscle contraction |
| AC-3 | Involuntary muscle lock, breathing difficulty |
| AC-4 | Ventricular fibrillation, cardiac arrest, severe burns, death |
When 20 mA is plotted on the curve, it sits at the upper boundary of AC-2 and the lower boundary of AC-3, meaning:
Recommended:
- Pain and reflexive contraction may occur
- Breathing may be affected in prolonged exposure
- It remains below AC-4, the zone associated with ventricular fibrillation, the primary cause of death from electrical shock
Common biological thresholds include:
- 1 mA → Tingling sensation
- 5 mA → Painful shock, still controllable
- 10 mA → Loss of voluntary muscle control (“cannot let go”)
- 20 mA → Possible respiratory interference
- 30 mA+ → Risk of ventricular fibrillation (fatal arrhythmia)
Thus, choosing 20 mA as the upper limit ensures functionality while remaining below the fatal threshold, embedding safety directly into the physical layer—no software or protection logic required.
Why 4 mA? — The Value of Live Zero Diagnostics
Don’t miss out on key updates, join our newsletter List
The lower boundary of 4 mA is equally intentional. Instead of using 0 mA as the baseline, the range begins at 4 mA for one primary reason:
0 mA can mean two different things — a valid measurement or a broken wire.
4 mA eliminates ambiguity.
This concept, called live-zero, enables immediate fault detection:
| Loop Current | Meaning |
| 0 mA | Broken wire, power loss, open loop fault |
| 0–3.8 mA | Fault condition (NAMUR NE43 standard) |
| 4–20 mA | Valid measurement range |
| > 20.5 mA | Sensor or loop saturation / fault |
This built-in diagnostic capability is one reason 4–20 mA remains essential in safety-critical industries such as power generation, oil & gas, chemical processing, mining, and pharmaceuticals—where silent failures are unacceptable.
Electrical Safety Proven Through Ohm’s Law
To understand why 20 mA is inherently safer than other signal standards, consider basic circuit behavior using Ohm’s Law:
I = V/R
Typical human body resistance varies:
- Dry skin: 5,000 – 7,000 Ω
- Wet skin: 500 – 1,000 Ω
Example 1 — Accidental contact at 50 V with 5,600 Ω body resistance:
I = 50/5600 which is approximately 8.9 mA
This is already near the “loss of grip” threshold (~10 mA).
Example 2 — To reach 20 mA through 5,000 Ω:
V = 0.02 x 5000 = 100 V
However, 4–20 mA loops typically operate at 12–24 VDC, far below the voltage required to push dangerous current through the body. Therefore:
✅ The system is self-limiting by electrical design
✅ It cannot deliver life-threatening current even in fault scenarios
✅ No additional active protection is required to maintain electrical safety
Engineering Benefits That Cemented Its Adoption
Beyond human safety, 4–20 mA survives because it excels in conditions where digital communication often struggles:
✔ Immune to electromagnetic interference (EMI) and ground noise
✔ Maintains accuracy over hundreds of meters of cable
✔ Unaffected by voltage drop, wire resistance, or termination impedance
✔ Simple to troubleshoot using only a multimeter
✔ Predictable failure behavior that is measurable and linear
✔ Works reliably in high-humidity, high-temperature, and high-vibration environments
Unlike voltage signals (0–10 V), where resistance and interference distort the signal, current remains constant through the loop regardless of cable length or conductor degradation.
Compatibility with Industrial Safety Standards
4–20 mA is not just common in automation—it is embedded in safety engineering frameworks:
| Standard | Purpose |
| IEC 61508 | Functional safety of electrical/electronic systems |
| IEC 61511 / ISA 84 | Safety instrumentation for process industries |
| IEC 60079 (Ex i) | Intrinsic safety in explosive environments |
| NAMUR NE 43 | Fault signaling for 4–20 mA systems |
Additionally, Safety Integrity Level (SIL) loops often rely on 4–20 mA because the signal can indicate both process value and fault condition without ambiguity.
Modernization Through HART, Not Replacement
Many predicted the replacement of 4–20 mA by fully digital fieldbus systems, but in practice, the opposite occurred—digital functions were layered on top of 4–20 mA, not instead of it.
HART (Highway Addressable Remote Transducer) enables:
- Digital diagnostics over the same 2-wire loop
- Remote configuration and commissioning
- Device health monitoring
- Asset management and predictive maintenance
This hybrid model preserves analog reliability while gaining digital intelligence, extending the life of 4–20 mA well into Industry 4.0.
Intrinsic Safety and Hazardous Area Compliance
Since 4–20 mA loops never exceed 20 mA, they align naturally with Intrinsically Safe (Ex i) design principles used in hazardous environments such as:
- Oil and gas refineries
- Chemical plants
- Grain silos
- LNG processing facilities
- Mining operations
Energy-limiting barriers can certify these loops as safe for explosive atmospheres without complex engineering, because the electrical energy is already bounded by design.
The Core Philosophy: Deterministic, Observable, Safe
Unlike digital communication, which can fail silently due to packet loss or checksum errors, analog current loops fail observably. Changes in current reflect real system state:
- Broken wire → 0 mA
- Sensor failure → < 3.8 mA
- Instrument saturation → > 20.5 mA
- Normal operation → 4–20 mA scaled signal
This determinism and transparency are the foundation of safety-critical engineering, where knowing that something is wrong is often more important than the measured value itself.
Conclusion
The 4–20 mA standard remains dominant not because industry resists change, but because it uniquely satisfies fundamental requirements that newer technologies still struggle to match simultaneously:
✅ Safe for human interaction by design
✅ Deterministic and diagnosable failure behavior
✅ Resilient to noise, distance, and harsh environments
✅ Compatible with modern digital upgrades via HART
✅ Ideal for SIL, ISA 84, IEC 61508, and Ex safety systems
It is not merely a method of transmitting data—it is a safety-anchored engineering philosophy that balances reliability, observability, and human protection.
Also read:

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.