Control Architectures for Smart EV Charging: Meeting NEC 2023, Demand Response, and Safety Standards

An Expert’s Guide to EV Load Management and NEC Compliance

Smart EV charging control architectures are systems that intelligently manage how and when electric vehicles (EVs) draw power. These architectures are essential for electricians installing multiple EV Supply Equipment (EVSE) units, as they enable compliance with NEC 2023 Article 625, particularly regarding load management. The primary goal is to prevent overloading electrical services by dynamically adjusting charging rates based on real-time building load. This is accomplished through systems like a dedicated EVSE Load Management System (LMS) or a site-level energy management system. Key architectures include centralized control, where a single controller manages all EVSEs, and decentralized control, where EVSEs communicate peer-to-peer. Understanding these systems is no longer optional; it’s a core competency for ensuring safe, efficient, and code-compliant EV charging installations that are prepared for advanced functions like utility demand response and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) integration.

Understanding Smart EV Charging Control Architectures

As the adoption of electric vehicles accelerates, the electrical infrastructure supporting them must evolve. Simply installing multiple EV chargers without an intelligent control strategy is a recipe for overloading circuits and services. This is where smart EV charging control architectures come into play. These are the brains behind an EV charging installation, ensuring that the total load of the EVSEs never exceeds the capacity of the electrical system.

These systems move beyond the static calculations of the past. Instead of assuming all chargers will operate at full capacity simultaneously, a smart architecture monitors the building’s total electrical load and allocates available power to the charging vehicles in real-time. This approach, often called Dynamic Load Management (DLM), is fundamental to the changes seen in the 2023 National Electrical Code. As an installer, your familiarity with these architectures directly impacts the safety, cost-effectiveness, and future-readiness of your projects. Many of the latest 2023 NEC rules changing EV charger installation requirements are centered on these new intelligent capabilities.

Key Control Architectures: Centralized vs. Decentralized

Smart charging control systems generally fall into two categories: centralized and decentralized. The choice between them depends on the scale of the project, budget, and desired level of resilience.

Centralized (Hierarchical) Control Systems

In a centralized or hierarchical control system, a single master controller or server makes all the decisions. This “brain” communicates with each individual EVSE, instructing it to increase, decrease, or pause charging. The central controller monitors the service or feeder and allocates the available amperage among the active EVSEs according to a pre-defined algorithm (e.g., first-come, first-served; equal sharing).

• Pros: Easier to implement sophisticated site-wide strategies like peak shaving, integration with building management systems (BMS), and participation in utility-grade grid ancillary services.
• Cons: Creates a single point of failure. If the master controller goes offline, the entire load management system may fail, potentially defaulting to a non-managed (and non-compliant) state unless a proper fail-safe is in place.

Decentralized Control Architecture

In a decentralized control architecture, intelligence is distributed among the EVSEs themselves. The chargers communicate with each other (peer-to-peer) to manage the total load. One EVSE might be designated as a temporary “leader” to monitor the main service connection, but there is no permanent, single master controller. If one unit fails, the others can continue to operate and manage the load.

• Pros: Increased reliability and resilience. No single point of failure. Often simpler to install for smaller-scale projects.
• Cons: Can be more challenging to implement complex, site-wide energy strategies or integrate with external systems like utility Demand Response (DR) programs.

NEC 2023 and EV Load Management Systems (LMS)

The most significant development for electricians in this area is the formal recognition of these systems in the NEC. NEC 2023 Article 625, specifically section 625.42, provides two options for load calculations for a service or feeder supplying EVSEs:

1. Calculate the load with all EVSEs at their maximum nameplate rating (the traditional method).
2. Use an EVSE Load Management System (LMS) to limit the maximum load of the EVSEs to the available capacity.

This second option is a game-changer. It allows for the installation of more chargers on an existing service than would be possible using traditional load calculations. However, the NEC sets strict performance requirements for these systems. Understanding how the 2023 NEC handles load calculations with energy management systems is crucial for any modern EV charging project.

Meeting NEC 625.42 with an EVSE LMS

An EVSE LMS used for NEC compliance must be certified for the purpose. It must monitor the total load on the feeder or service and actively control the EVSEs to ensure the calculated load is not exceeded. The system must be “fail-safe,” meaning if the control signal is lost, the EVSEs must default to a state that prevents overload—typically by ceasing to charge or reducing to a predetermined safe level.

Primary Sources for Compliance

Always refer to the official source code and standards for final verification. These documents form the basis of safe and compliant installations.

• NFPA 70: The National Electrical Code (NEC), specifically Article 625. (View at NFPA.org)
• UL 2594: Standard for Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment. (View at UL.com)
• UL 916: Standard for Energy Management Equipment.

Step-by-Step: Verifying an EVSE LMS for Code Compliance

Before commissioning an installation that relies on an EVSE LMS for load calculation, the professional electrician must verify its compliance. Follow these steps:

1. Verify Listing and Labeling: Ensure the EVSE LMS, whether integrated into the chargers or as a separate controller, is listed and labeled for the purpose of energy management (e.g., to UL 916) and that the EVSEs themselves are listed (e.g., to UL 2594).
2. Review Manufacturer’s Documentation: The manufacturer must provide clear instructions stating that the system is designed to comply with NEC 625.42. The documentation should specify the system’s response time and fail-safe behavior.
3. Confirm CT Placement and Configuration: Verify that the current transformers (CTs) monitoring the service or feeder are installed in the correct location per the manufacturer’s instructions and NEC requirements. Incorrect placement can lead to inaccurate load monitoring.
4. Program the System Correctly: The system must be programmed with the correct maximum allowable load for the feeder or service. This is the value the system will defend. This critical step links your EVSE load requirement calculations to the real-world performance of the system.
5. Test the Fail-Safe Mechanism: As part of the commissioning process, simulate a failure of the control system (e.g., by disconnecting the communication line to an EVSE). Verify that the charger defaults to its safe state (ceases charging or reduces power) as specified by the manufacturer and required by the NEC.

The complexity of these systems and their direct impact on NEC compliance is significant. Don’t leave your knowledge to chance. Master NEC 2023 changes with our courses to ensure every installation is safe, compliant, and efficient.

The Role of Interoperability Standards in Smart Charging

For these control architectures to work, especially across equipment from different manufacturers, standardized communication protocols are essential. These interoperability standards are the languages that allow EVSEs, control systems, and even the utility grid to speak to each other.

OCPP 2.0.1 and ISO 15118

Two of the most important standards are the Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP) and ISO 15118.

• OCPP: This protocol governs communication between the EVSE (the “charge point”) and a central management system. Versions like OCPP 2.0.1 include specific functionalities for smart charging, such as sending load-limiting profiles to chargers.
• ISO 15118: This standard facilitates communication between the EV itself and the EVSE. It enables advanced features like “Plug & Charge” (automatic authentication) and is the foundational protocol for bidirectional power flow, or Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G).

The Importance of EV Charging Cybersecurity

As these systems become more connected, EV charging cybersecurity becomes paramount. A compromised system could be used to destabilize a building’s electrical system or even the local grid. While standards like UL 2594 are critical for the electrical safety of the EVSE, cybersecurity is addressed by separate standards, such as the UL 2900 series for network-connectable devices. As an installer, choosing equipment certified to both appropriate safety and cybersecurity standards is part of your professional responsibility.

Advanced Applications: Demand Response (DR) and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G)

Smart control architectures are the gateway to the most advanced EV-grid integration functions. While not yet universally deployed, you should be aware of them as they represent the future of the industry.

• Demand Response (DR): Utility companies can send signals to a site’s energy management system, requesting a temporary reduction in load during peak demand periods to help stabilize the grid. The EVSE LMS can respond by throttling down charging rates across the managed vehicles.
• Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G): This technology, enabled by ISO 15118 and bidirectional chargers, allows a parked and connected EV to discharge its battery to power a building (Vehicle-to-Building, V2B) or export power back to the grid (V2G). This can provide backup power during an outage or generate revenue by providing grid ancillary services.
• Peak Shaving: A site-level energy management system can use EV batteries (via V2B) or simply curtail EV charging to reduce a facility’s peak demand, significantly lowering utility demand charges.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an EVSE Load Management System (LMS) under NEC 2023?

An EVSE Load Management System, as defined in NEC 2023 Article 625.42, is a system designed to actively monitor the electrical load on a service or feeder and control the power delivered by EVSEs to ensure the circuit’s capacity is not exceeded. It must be listed for this purpose and include a fail-safe mechanism. This allows for more chargers to be installed on a given service than traditional load calculations would permit.

How do smart charging standards like OCPP 2.0.1 affect an EV charging installation?

Standards like OCPP 2.0.1 are critical for interoperability. For an electrician, this means you can select an OCPP-compliant central controller from one manufacturer and OCPP-compliant EVSEs from another, with a high degree of confidence that they will work together for load management. It future-proofs the installation, allowing for easier system expansion or replacement of components down the line.

What’s the difference between Demand Response (DR) and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G)?

Demand Response (DR) is a one-way control action where the utility or grid operator requests a reduction in electricity consumption. For EV charging, this means temporarily slowing or stopping charging. Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) is a two-way action where an EV’s battery not only consumes power but can also discharge power back to the grid or a building. V2G requires a bidirectional charger and a compatible vehicle.

---

About ExpertCE

At Expert CE, we specialize in providing affordable, high-quality, state-approved continuing education courses for licensed professionals across the United States. Our content is designed by industry experts to keep professionals informed, compliant, and up to date with the latest codes, laws, and safety standards. We share practical insights, regulatory updates, and resources to support your professional growth and license renewal.

Also read: The Connection of Green Energy Generation Plants to Power Systems: Key Factors to Consider